Tracking Surpression of Online Free Speech

Threatened Voices is a collaborative mapping project to build a database of bloggers who have been threatened, arrested or killed for speaking out online and to draw attention to the campaigns to free them.  It allows anyone to report bloggers who are being threatened or under arrest.  Help hold governments accountable for free speech.

Youth Is Not a Pre-Existing Condition

Friend and fellow NOI Bootcamper covers youth and the healthcare fight and uses my story on WireTap’s Blog, which covers ideas and action for a new generation:

Posted by Steve Romain at 9:31AM November 2, 2009

For most of my life, I have been uninsured.

My dad — who had covered me on his policies — would change jobs often, resulting in there being huge gaps between different insurance companies. More often than not, traditional doctor worries wouldn’t scare me: the question of whether I actually had insurance would.

My story isn’t anything original, though.

The barriers to entry for health insurance are so high that many youth simply go without. It’s not that we don’t want it: we’re perfectly aware we’re not invincible. We’re just priced out of the market. I suppose that’s why you never see any “Blue Cross means Bitchin’ Coverage!” ads, targeted at a younger demographic.

A recent study (PDF) by the AFL-CIO found that a whopping 31 percent of young workers are uninsured. Moreover, young blue-collar workers are uninsured 40 percent of the time. The key barrier to entry for health care? You guessed it — cost.

How about those lower priced options, like otherwise-unfortunately-named Catastrophic Coverage? Usually, they’re not so good.

“[Insurance companies] would quote you a ridiculously low price but when you read the fine print, the coverage was very little and the out of pocket expenses were ridiculous,” Erinlynn Scott says.

A self-employed dance teacher, Ms. Scott must purchase an unsubsidized policy. Due to medical issues and a pre-existing condition, she has been denied coverage by many insurers and is forced to pay dramatically high premiums for lackluster coverage.

Although Aetna denies many procedures, such as blood work, she knows there is no way around the high monthly fees and uncovered treatments and pays into her policy every month.

So what do we do when something goes really wrong, such as if we’re in an accident?

According to some EMTs, you could always just not go to the hospital. Erin Mazursky found that out the hard way.

After a car accident, the EMTs asked her if she wanted to be brought to the hospital, even though she was badly injured. “I was really confused as to why I wouldn’t go to the hospital, considering my condition,” Ms. Mazursky said, “and realized later on that the question was posed because they wanted to know if I had health care.”

If she didn’t have health care at the time of the accident, the ambulance trip to the hospital and ER visit would have cost her about $2,000.

Ms. Mazursky is currently freelancing and covered by COBRA, but fears for the day when COBRA coverage runs out. She would “rather go into debt than not have any coverage at all,” echoing the sentiments of many, contrary to the common perception of young people as daredevils and ‘invincibles.’

Her fears aren’t unfounded: young people find themselves having to walk the tightrope of living on lower incomes without the safety net of coverage all too often. Without reform, this vicious situation shows no signs of stopping.

Sooner or later, the tightrope will shake — then what do we do?

 

How the Internet Strengthens Dictatorships

The Obama Generation, 1 Year Later

“Obama has been called a rock star, but this group’s experiences suggest that the campaign instilled a commitment to service, not a cult of personality.”

With nearly 6,000 staffers and tens of thousands of more volunteers, the Obama campaign didn’t just motivate people towards victory, they trained a generation of progressive leaders who will continue to imbue a culture of service and organizing.  This “progressive salesforce” can serve as an unbeatable force for the progressive movement — in both defining it and winning its battles — but we need increased engagement and means for these young people to translate the skills they learned on the campaign into productive, contributive careers.

The Obama Generation, Revisited:
The 2008 election galvanized young voters and organizers. One year
later, where are they?

 

Watch a video about the Obama youthquake, one year later, here.

Not everyone at President Obama’s healthcare rally at the University of Maryland on September 17 was as “fired up and ready to go” as he was. There were frat boys clowning around, students excited to see a president–any president–young men in matching T-shirts who were there solely because of their sheet metal workers union and one antiabortion activist with remarkable lungs. But it’s safe to say that on that drizzly day, the Comcast Center was packed with 12,000 mostly young people who supported the president and his healthcare plan. As the marching band played “Copacabana” not once, not twice, but three times, student volunteers made sure the spectators–some of whom had lined up at 5:30 am–stayed within the cordoned areas. Young women in Healthcare ‘09 T-shirts craned to catch a glimpse of Obama, and after he finally emerged there was a cacophony of “I love you, Barack!”

On November 4, 2008, Barack Obama won 66 percent of voters under 30, increasing the Democratic share of the youth vote by 12 percent over 2004. Young people were among Obama’s earliest and most important supporters; people under 30, for example, represented Obama’s margin of victory in Iowa, the crucial first caucus. Rallies like this one, with thousands of young people putting their hands in the air for healthcare reform, are the most obvious indication of continuing youth enthusiasm for the president. Plenty in the crowd had volunteered for his campaign, including Eric Stehmer, 28, a University of Maryland graduate who has been unemployed for a year and has only catastrophic health coverage; Mouhamad Diabate, 21, a U of M student who canvassed for Obama and has several thousand dollars in medical bills that he’s trying to ignore; and Chrisi West, 30, an enthusiastic Virginia “supervolunteer” whose parents lost their home when she was a child after her father got sick, and who seemed to know all the student volunteers from their work together on the campaign.

West had never touched politics before Obama, and now she’s addicted, continuing to volunteer thirty-five hours a week for Organizing for America, the DNC group that grew out of the Obama campaign. The extraordinary impact of Obama’s election on young people is not limited to supporting his legislative priorities. It’s harder to measure than the audience at a rally, but the campaign is the reason, for example, a former professional cellist is now a union organizer and a former firefighter is an environmentalist. It galvanized a generation of first-time volunteers, and a year later many of them are still working for change they can believe in–which doesn’t necessarily mean they’re working for Obama himself.

In interviews with thirty young people around the country who worked on the Obama field campaign, almost all said that they continued their activism well after the endorphins of winning wore off. Obama has been called a rock star, but this group’s experiences suggest that the campaign instilled a commitment to service, not a cult of personality. Though many former campaigners are still fans and several now work for the Obama administration, most are less interested in Washington politics than they are in community organizing. As former staffer Marcus Ryan, 25, says, “Once you turn on that community organizing perspective, it’s hard to turn off.”

According to experts and campaign veterans, the Obama for America field operation hooked its workers on organizing in a way never seen before. As former New Mexico staffer Elizabeth Kistin, 28, puts it, “The candidate gets people in the door, but it’s the campaign that keeps them coming back.” The Obama for America catchphrase was “Respect, Empower, Include,” and the campaign offered young volunteers responsibility galore.

Still, not every worker had the same transformative experience. By all accounts this was the most diverse presidential field campaign ever, but it was largely white, middle-class college graduates who had the time and means to move from swing state to swing state as volunteers. Many of them earned staff positions as a result. But despite its weaknesses, the campaign seems to have achieved the near impossible: making crunchy old community organizing sexy. The question is: what will these freshly minted young organizers do with their new skills?

After the election, about half of the thirty interviewees are in school or returned to their old jobs, but the lives of the other half completely changed. Four work for the administration, five started their own Washington nonprofit, two are full-time organizers, two are organizers in training and one joined Teach for America. Three who were at different stages of becoming lawyers now have other plans. The interviewees joined the campaign for many reasons: because they identified with Obama, because they were sick of complaining, because they were antiwar, because they wanted healthcare reform, because they felt guilty for not helping John Kerry, because they loved Michelle.

Though most of them uprooted themselves and dedicated at least a month to the campaign, some integrated their activism into their everyday lives. Lana Wilson, 26, of New York, held a series of “Obamaerobics” fundraisers and sold Barack Your Body T-shirts to raise money for the campaign. Anthony Williams, 22, of Cincinnati, hired a white limousine to take people to the polls during a voter registration gig. Sgt. Mike Buchholz, 23, started a Soldiers for Obama Facebook group while he was in training at Fort Gordon, Georgia.

Longtime political observers are in awe of what Obama accomplished. “I spent most of my adult life where you say, Young people don’t vote,” says Democratic strategist Paul Maslin. “Now we have to throw aside those assumptions. That’s a terrific thing. Obama took what we did with [Howard] Dean to new heights. People clicked in and clicked on. That activism can’t be switched off easily.”

Professor Peter Dreier of Occidental College, who trained workers during the campaign and teaches community organizing, says that the key change from previous presidential elections is the difference between marketing a product and activating a community. “This campaign was about building relationships among people that last beyond election day,” he says. Partly because of the never-ending primary battle, Obama for America had offices in rural areas that had previously been ignored by candidates. In New Mexico, for example, the Obama campaign had thirty-nine offices in advance of the general election, compared with Kerry’s sixteen in 2004. But beyond the many warm bodies, there was the strategy that empowered them.

While the Edwards and Clinton campaigns skipped young people in favor of reliable older voters, former youth director Hans Riemer poured resources into cultivating the youth of Iowa. His team developed the Barack Stars program, which targeted 17-year-olds who would be eligible to participate in the caucuses. “Our whole student program was run by volunteers,” says Riemer, who previously worked for Rock the Vote. “Barack represents a thousand different answers to what young people were looking for,” he says. “Who he is, his background, the issues he’s worked on, his vision, his style.” Riemer and other strategists developed a campaign climate that kept volunteers coming back. Field organizers around the country built comfy offices that became rec centers for young people.

To veteran activists used to running campaigns on a shoestring, Obama for America’s volunteer-driven strategy wasn’t rocket science, but it was breaking news to the establishment. Volunteers on most large-scale campaigns can expect to phone-bank or door-knock and not much else. But on the Obama campaign, they could be promoted to several key roles: team leader, campus captain, data coordinator, phone-bank captain or house party captain. The local field organizer would meet with a prospective volunteer one-on-one; this initial conversation usually involved storytelling, during which the staffer explained what brought him to the campaign and then asked the volunteer for her story. From there, he would ask her to commit to something: hosting a house party or recruiting other volunteers, for example.

“What was so remarkable about the Obama field campaign is that it took a leap of faith in ordinary people,” says Zack Exley, the former organizing director for MoveOn.org and the Kerry campaign’s online communications director. “For thousands and thousands of young people, it was the first big responsibility they took on.” Nicole Derse, 31, the training director of Organizing for America, agrees. “Our success as a campaign depended on young people’s leadership,” she says. “At Penn State, we told our volunteers, ‘If you don’t organize your dorms, they’re not going to get organized. If you don’t get them registered to vote, they probably won’t vote.’ Young people aren’t expected to do that.”

While many staffers and volunteers speak of the excitement in the campaign offices, the work wasn’t always fun. Zerlina Maxwell, 28, who took a year off from law school at Rutgers to work as a field organizer in Virginia, experienced the highs and lows. The high was Karl, a dedicated 89-year-old volunteer who arrived early for every Saturday-morning canvass. The low happened when she knocked on a door on a quiet street in Yorktown. “This woman said, Nigger, get off of my porch and take your shit with you!” says Maxwell. “She threw the literature back at me and slammed the door.”

Maxwell wasn’t the only young worker to experience racial tensions while working on the campaign for the first black president. Speaking off the record, many African-American staffers and volunteers noted that the static wasn’t just with belligerent voters. Some mention a lack of respect on the part of young white field organizers for fellow organizers or local volunteers, some of whom had much more experience. In some states, white field organizers were sent into any and all communities, but black organizers worked only in African-American areas.

Others were frustrated by the weaknesses of the campaign’s mostly young, inexperienced staff. Obamaerobics instructor Lana Wilson volunteered in Toledo, Ohio, for six weeks before the election and wasn’t entirely sold. “They had limitless energy and enthusiasm,” she says. “But they had no office experience and no experience delegating tasks or making people feel appreciated. I thought, There’ll be an arrogant generation of people saying, ‘I worked on the Obama campaign.’”

Wilson needn’t worry too much about their egos. Though some campaign staffers now work for the administration or nonprofits, it turns out that in this economy a year as a field organizer isn’t the résumé boost some may have hoped for. Young organizers emerged from victory into a full-blown recession, with high unemployment, huge cuts in the nonprofit sector and a 21 percent decrease in internships nationwide. Much of the scaffolding for civic engagement and the entry-level positions that come with it had shrunk or disappeared.

Plenty of former staffers went back to previous gigs or enrolled in grad school, but some faced bleaker prospects. According to Demond Drummer, 26, a field organizer during the primaries in South Carolina, one of his most dedicated volunteers was a high school student who got to chair a meeting with Obama’s sister. That young man had a history of discipline problems in school, and he is now behind bars (Drummer’s not sure why); he will be out this month. “He’s a leader, but he had nothing else to do after the election,” says Drummer. In Kansas City, Missouri, where he lives, Exley sees former superstar field organizers working at coffee shops.

Exley, whose New Organizing Institute offered fellowships to several former field organizers, including Drummer, believes that Obama campaign veterans represent an extraordinary talent pool for the progressive movement. “On the right, they always suck up talent after elections to keep them warm and employed with healthcare until the next campaign,” he says. “I think [progressive] groups didn’t understand that the experience of being an Obama field organizer was something special and enriching, because on other campaigns people didn’t really get much out of it. In most places, the Kerry field campaign didn’t give young staff or volunteers a disciplined, accountable experience. The Obama field campaign was in most places an incredible work experience for young people.”

Absent any systematic attempts to recruit them, hundreds of Obama campaign vets flocked to Washington in hopes of finding work in the administration or the many nonprofits headquartered there. Many remained unemployed as the administration’s hiring process dragged on: after working for months with no days off, they found themselves on an extended unpaid vacation in an expensive city, draining their savings accounts.

Some who survived the long wait were rewarded with administration jobs. Hallie Montoya Tansey, 29, known for her work as field director for the League of Young Voters, joined the Obama campaign early and was a deputy field director in Wisconsin for the general election. She’s now a confidential assistant to the chief of staff of the education secretary.

At The Nation’s request, Montoya Tansey compiled a list of 101 young staffers and dedicated volunteers she’d met while on the Obama field campaign. Their current occupations offer some insight into where field campaign grads have gone since the election. Of the 101 she profiled, about 70 had never worked on a political campaign before. Since the campaign, sixty-three have found jobs within the administration and its many departments. A former drug and alcohol counselor works for the Office of Drug Control Policy; a former producer on MTV’s The Hills was hired as a data manager at the DNC. Another nine have taken jobs on new campaigns or with elected officials. Others are back in school, unemployed, working for nonprofits or waiting tables. (Montoya Tansey’s sample is consistent with reports from other former field organizers.)

Since the election, two of the thirty campaigners I spoke with have worked on Organizing for America’s campaign for healthcare, and another, Nicole Derse, has a role in running it. Marianne von Nordeck, 29, is a former concert cellist who’d never participated in politics before. She was mentored by Derse during the primaries in Massachusetts and New Hampshire–”Nicole totally changed my life,” says von Nordeck–and went on to work as the field director of a State Senate campaign in the general election. She now works as a healthcare organizer for the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), a union with 1.6 million members nationwide. Von Nordeck went a year without asthma inhaler refills because she had no health insurance, so the issue resonated with her.

“I couldn’t go back to what I did before,” she says. “We didn’t all drop what we were doing and change our lives just because we liked Obama. We wanted to move the country forward.” Of the nineteen campaign coordinators AFSCME hired last spring to work on healthcare reform, fifteen are Obama campaign veterans.

Not all of the former field campaign workers have von Nordeck’s zest for policy change, but even if they’re not active community organizers, several hope to return to organizing as soon as they can get jobs in the field. Many interviewees emphasized that the campaign gave them a new sense of community.

That’s true for Mike Jones, 20, a sophomore at New York University. Jones was one of the young superstars of the primary season; he fundraised in order to volunteer for the campaign (“Working for free is very expensive,” he says) and was eventually hired as a field organizer. He worked in Nevada, Texas and his home state, North Carolina–all while he still had braces on his teeth. “If I had emerged from the campaign with only a reinforced political ideology I would have been missing the point,” says Jones. “Before, I didn’t think of community as an instrument for achieving.” Over the years, Jones’s sense of community has been shaky. Because of his parents’ financial difficulties, he spent high school in a Christian group home called Crossnore, which supported him financially during the campaign as well as in college.

Jones received an undergraduate research grant from NYU that he’s now using to invest in the community he left behind. He interviews young residents of group homes in California, New Jersey and North Carolina about how they construct their personal histories despite their transient lives. It’s a skill he developed on the campaign during those crucial one-on-one meetings with volunteers. “It was the experience of sharing a personal narrative with a complete stranger that laid the foundation for the organizing,” he says.

It’s clear that the Obama campaign has had a striking impact on the paths of young people who had never been involved in politics before. Until November 2007, Marcus Ryan was a firefighter with the Tatanka Hotshots in South Dakota. When he heard Obama’s speech during the New Hampshire primary, he says, “The hairs raised on the back of my neck. I realized something’s happening in America, and you either answer that call or you don’t.” The 25-year-old joined the Obama campaign as a volunteer in Texas. By the time of the general election, he was on staff as the regional field director in Miami. On November 4, after the election had been called for Obama, Ryan strategized with fellow campaign workers over rum and Cokes about how to use green jobs to fight poverty. Soon after, he and several other young Obama veterans came up with the DC Project, which aims to generate demand for green jobs [see "DC's New Green Shoots," page 17]. “It’s more exciting now, because the campaign was a promise of what was possible,” he says. “And now we’re trying to make sure that promise is granted.”

Caroline Gibbons, 22, had never voted before; she was eligible in 2004 but didn’t change her registration from Queens, where she grew up, to the Bronx, where she was studying at Fordham University. “I’m very liberal and outspoken, but I thought of elections as something for the wealthy and well connected,” she says. That changed her senior year. She’d been a fan of Obama’s since his 2004 DNC speech, and starting in the fall of 2007 she registered voters on street corners. After graduating, she forfeited her law school deposit and accepted a Teach for America position instead. “I thought I’d be a hypocrite if I took the ‘When in doubt, be a lawyer,’ route,” she says. In August 2008 Gibbons started as a second grade teacher in Coahoma County, a poor area in the Mississippi Delta. She changed her registration and drove people to the polls on November 4; the county went 73 percent for Obama. “My students think he’s the best president we’ve ever had,” she says. “Teaching is one way the momentum I felt from the campaign is actually carried out, day to day. These kids can keep it going.”

Some of the first-time volunteers are like Chrisi West: still behind Obama 100 percent–she phone-banks and campaigns for healthcare with Organizing for America at the same farmers’ markets she visited before the election, on top of her full-time job at a nonprofit. But others have been disappointed by the president on issues like civil liberties, the Iraq War, the presence of usual suspect lobbyists or because of the way the White House handled the Van Jones case. For Arizonan Jake Harvey, 20, who dedicated much of his freshman and sophomore years at Northern Arizona University to the field campaign, it’s gay rights.

Almost a year after the election, Harvey, who was diagnosed in April with leukemia, has mixed feelings about Obama’s presidency. “I still have a box of campaign gear and newspaper clippings from 2007 that I will one day share with my children, grandchildren and the students I teach,” he says. “But now that he’s been in office for nine months, I’ve become a little more cynical. As a gay person, I am holding him to the fire to deliver.”

Before the election, Harvey wasn’t in the legislative loop. He is now, and as soon as he’s recovered from chemo, he plans to get more involved in gay rights organizations focusing on issues like “don’t ask, don’t tell” and the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. Like everyone interviewed for this article, Harvey had his own reasons for devoting a year to Obama. But though the interviewees’ priorities are different, the skills they developed are similar, as is the sense that they can organize communities to win.

This is the “Yes We Can” generation. Working on the Obama field campaign has given them an unrestrained, sometimes naïve optimism, and if Obama indoctrinated them with anything, it’s a belief in the power of civic engagement. Some plan to use the tools they learned to hold the man they elected accountable. More want to advance their own issues on their own terms. But none of them want to be Associate No. 27 at a corporate law firm. They’re just hoping somebody notices and offers them a job.

About Elizabeth Méndez Berry

Elizabeth Méndez Berry, an award-winning journalist, has written about culture and politics for publications including the Washington Post, the Village Voice and Vibe. more…

Lack of Youth Vote is the Reason for 2009 Election Losses

Great piece by Heather Horn on The Atlantic Wire yesterday on the lack of the youth vote in Tuesday’s elections, where Democrats lost the incumbency of their gubernatorial races in both New Jersey and Virginia as well as the tragic repeal of gay marriage in Maine, where they voted Yes on No. 1.

More on this later, but here is an excerpt and link to the article:

What Happened to the Youth Vote?http://www.theatlanticwire.com/opinions/view/opinion/What-Happened-to-the-Youth-Vote-1490

By Heather Horn on November 04, 2009 8:31am

Young people helped swing the vote in 2008 with a big turnout, and
they helped swing the vote in 2009 as well–by staying home. With
Republicans winning big in New Jersey and Virginia, Politico’s Ben
Smith succinctly sums up what a lot are saying, looking at exit poll
data: “The key point is that this wasn’t your president’s electorate.”

Undocumented Youth, Finding their Voice

Dream Activist, the undocumented students action and resource network, is a network of undocumented and documented immigrant youth who are leading the effort around the DREAM Act, demanding a right to affordably go to college and receive an education.

Visit http://www.dreamactivist.org/ to learn more about their incredible efforts that is keeping immigration at the top of hot button issues in this country.

Secretary Clinton Announces Civil Society 2.0 Initiative to Build Capacity of Grassroots Organizations

Really promising initiative launched from the State Department earlier this week.  You know that when State is making technology and civil society a priority that it’s really hitting home.

Marrakech, Morocco
November 3, 2009

In her remarks today to the Forum for the Future, Secretary Clinton announced Civil Society 2.0, which will help grassroots organizations around the world use digital technology to tell their stories, build their memberships and support bases, and connect to their community of peers around the world.

Building the capacity of grassroots civil society organizations will enable them to do the work that, in the past, Western NGOs and governments have done. With increased capacity, communities are better able to initiate, administer and sustain their
own programs and solutions to shared problems.

“Civil Society 2.0” includes the following components:

1. Deploying a team of experienced technologists to work with civil society organizations around the globe to provide training and support to build their digital capacity. The competencies developed in the trainings will include:
   • How to build a website
   • How to blog
   • How to launch a text messaging campaign
   • How to build an online community
   • How to leverage social networks for a cause
2. Partnering these technologists with local civil society organizations and governments to develop and implement
   technology-based solutions to local problems.
3. Publishing interactive “how to” programs and curriculum online to help organizations that do not have access to in-person assistance.
4. Creating a curated open platform that allows any citizen or company to develop, share or suggest content for the curriculum.
5. Allocating $5 million in grant funds for pilot programs in the Middle East and North Africa that will bolster the new media and networking capabilities of civil society organizations and promote online learning in the region.

The United States is a strong supporter of civil society around the world. Civil society activists and organizations work to improve the quality of people’s lives and protect their rights, hold leaders accountable to their constituents, shine light on abuses in both the public and private sectors, and advance the rule of law and social justice. They are key partners for progress.

The Forum for the Future is a joint civil society initiative of the countries of the Broader Middle East and North Africa region (BMENA) and the Group of Eight (G8). It brings together leaders from government, civil society and the private sector to exchange ideas and form partnerships to support progress, reform, and expanded opportunities for the people of the region.

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2009/nov/131234.htm

Guinea’s Youth Stage 5-Day Hunger Strike

From Voice of America: http://www.voanews.com/english/africa/2009-10-28-voa4.cfm?rss=africa

By Peter Clottey 28 October 2009

Various youth organizations in Guinea are scheduled to go on a five-day nationwide hunger strike beginning Wednesday to push the country’s military leaders to resolve the political crisis.

Guinean police arrest a protester on in front of the biggest stadium in the capital Conakry during a protest banned by Guinea’s ruling junta, 28 Sep 2009

The youth say they want the military junta and the opposition to come up with a compromise about the way forward for the nation.

They expressed concern about the country’s worsening political situation which the youth said led to the recent massacre of unarmed protesters.

Attorney Thierno Balde, one of the leading organizers of the hunger strike said that there would be another round of hunger strike if the country’s leaders fail to come up with a compromising solution to the crisis.

“There are several youth from the Youth Federation of the Association of Guinea who are organizing a hunger strike. The objective of the hunger strike is to let all political leaders in Guinea (know) that we are concerned about the situation and we will like to have peace and stability in Guinea,” Balde said.

He said all leaders should have an input in finding a solution to the crisis.

“In order to get peace, we have to have an agreement which involves all the parties and which satisfies all the parties involved,” he said.

Balde called for an end to violence.

“We have to end violence and we have to have justice for all the victims,” Balde said.

He said the ongoing crisis needs a political solution.

Guinea’s military leader Capt. Moussa Dadis Camara (l) walks with Burkina Faso President Blaise Compaore as he arrives at Conakry airport, 5 Oct 2009

“We are asking all people from Guinea that the situation is political not an ethnic problem and no one should really make it an ethnic (problem). It’s a political situation (and) we have to find a political solution,” he said.

Balde said the youth will petition the military junta as well as the opposition.

“Yes we have declared from which we made, and the declaration concerns not only the military but also the opposition. We are asking them to find an agreement on the basis of the recommendation, which we stated in our declaration,” Balde said.

He said the youth is also asking for a unity government.

The bodies of people killed during a rally are seen at the capital’s main mosque in Conakry, Guinea

“The main recommendation which we are asking is to set up a transitional entity which satisfy all the parties and which will be lead by a neutral personality,” he said.

Balde said the youth will continue with the hunger strike until a solution to the crisis is found.

“If we don’t get satisfaction we are going to organize this hunger strike not only here in Conakry, but all around the main cities in the country,” Balde said.

Meanwhile, union workers are also expected to begin a sit down strike Wednesday to press home their demand for a unity government to replace the military junta.

AYM ‘09: Moldova’s Twitter Revolution

My final installment on my series on the Alliance of Youth Movements in GOOD Magazine.  Natalia is incredible.  Her poise and articulation are something to strive for, and her work is truly inspiring.  See the original post in GOOD here.

Interviews from the Alliance of Youth Movements summit: Natalia Morari.

On the 6th of April of this year, 15,000 Moldovans rallied in the streets the day after their national election to protest the Communist Party’s rigged victory. It might have looked like any post-election protest in an emerging democracy but there was an important difference: This protest was organized entirely through new media—Twitter, email and text messages, and social networking sites. The number of peaceful protesters continued to grow over the course of a few days, and they eventually succeeded in upsetting the Communist Party’s majority in parliament.

Guest blogger Erin Mazursky spoke with Natalia Morari, one of catalysts of the protests and keynote speaker at the recent Alliance of Youth Movements summit. Morari now leads ThinkMoldova, a platform to help young Moldovans take part in the future of their country.

ERIN MAZURSKY: How did you mobilize so many people in such a short period of time?

NATALIA MORARI: When the results were announced the day after the election, with the Communist Party as the winners, so many of my friends were saying they wanted to leave Moldova. The country was in mourning. So a few of us met up at a café to talk about what we might be able to do. We decided to do a flash mob that evening in the center of Chisinau, Moldova’s capital city.

We immediately began sending out messages in every way we could—through Twitter, Facebook, email, SMS—with the message: “If you believe your vote was stolen, if you did not vote for the Communists, come to the center of the city.” And people came. We are generally a quiet people, and tens of thousands in the street is a big deal.

EM: What is your hope for Moldova?

NM: My dream used to be to live and work in Moscow. I left for Russia in 2002, went to college there, and became a journalist. In 2007, I was arrested in Russia because I was writing about various corruption scandals. The experience made me come back to Moldova, and I realized that my place is there. I really want to do something great for my country’s future and raise my children there.

So many young people leave for the West, get their degrees, and never come back, but these days more and more of these young people are coming back with the intent of making real change. My hope for this country is that together, these young people can help shape a better future.

EM: How is ThinkMoldova helping to make this happen?

NM: ThinkMoldova is currently creating a platform for young, educated people interested in politics, economics, and social life to come back and talk about how we can best develop the country, and who are willing to start working on the issues in our country when they are young. We are bringing in people from all over the world who have helped shape progress in their own countries on issues from tax reform to infrastructure building so that we can learn from others’ experiences and apply it to Moldova.

EM: How is this generation, the so-called Millennial generation, different from generations past?

NM: The only thing that’s different about our generation is that we have this great opportunity to feel like we are a part of the big world. If I were born in Moldova 100 years ago, I never would have seen other European countries or dreamed about visiting America. Now, we can travel all over the world sitting just in front of a laptop. We have more freedom of expression, a greater access to information, and new experiences just because we can communicate with each other through the internet.

It’s a question of who uses this information and to what ends, of course, but you are not just born in your country. Our generation isn’t confined to our respective nationalities—American, British, Moldovan—we are global-Americans, global-British, global-Moldovans. We have more possibilities now, and I think that’s great.

EM: What was your favorite part of your experience at the Alliance of Youth Movements summit?

NM: It was really crazy to meet someone like Oscar Morales, who mobilized 12 million people around the world against the FARC, or a kid like Shubham Kanodia, who is just fourteen, who made a great social movement in India after the Mumbai attacks. The most interesting thing was to find how similar we were and know that, for example, someone who was in Ecuador is experiencing different problems but driven by the same principles. All these people were young and all these people do believe that they can make real changes. To feel like we were all connected was the great thing about A.Y.M.

AYM ‘09: A STAND Against Genocide

Third installation on the Alliance of Youth Movements in GOOD Magazine blog.

• Posted by: Erin Mazursky
• on October 28, 2009 at 5:00 am

Interviews from the Alliance of Youth Movements summit: Daniel Teweles.

STAND, the student-led arm of the Genocide Intervention Network, began in 2004 as an effort to end the genocide in Darfur, Sudan. Now STAND works not just to end mass atrocities in places like Sudan, Burma, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, but to prevent them, and has grown to include 800 active chapters in high schools and colleges nationwide, making it one of the largest student organizations in the country. Guest blogger Erin Mazursky sat down with Daniel Teweles, STAND’s National Student Coordinator, during the Alliance of Youth Movements summit in Mexico City to talk about the Millennial generation—people born after 1980—and how to get through to senators.

ERIN MAZURSKY: So, you get to work with some incredibly passionate students doing very important work. What do you like most about your job?

DANIEL TEWELES: Hands down, making connections between seemingly disparate people. Everyone can get behind the work that we’re doing whether it’s high school students in Kansas or nursing students in New Jersey.

EM: Can you tell us about an upcoming project to look out for?

DT: What I’m most excited about is our Pledge2Protect campaign, specifically the pledge on camera partnership with Witness. It’s the first time video has been used for advocacy on this scale. On the last day of our upcoming conference, taking place in a couple of weeks here in Washington, D.C., we’re sending people up to Capitol Hill to meet with all 100 senators. With them will be a video of constituents from each of their districts. We are replacing the talking policy heads that are usually talking about these issues with the Senator’s high school science teacher, their biggest donor, the mayor of their town.

EM: We hear a lot about the Millennial generation being geared towards making a difference. Do you think is there is something unique about this generation of youth?

DT: Yes and no. I don’t think there’s anything unique about this generation, but I think there’s something unique in the time that they’re growing up and the tools available to them. What happens 10,000 miles away affects us now. In the past we wouldn’t have known about it or wouldn’t have known to care, but now we have the tools to be connected and to act.

EM: STAND has been a force against genocide for the last five years. How do you keep the momentum going on a crisis that seems unending?

DT: What STAND does really well, and what helps our staying power, is that there’s no typical genocide activist. We attract students of all ages and backgrounds, and as a result we’re shaping future leaders—not just anti-genocide activists but activists in general.

EM: You were surrounded by 40 some like-minded youth at the summit in Mexico City. Name someone who made a big impression on you.

DT: Prashan de Visser from Sri Lanka Unites. Despite my work, I’m generally a cynic. It takes a lot to inspire me, but his life story and the work that he’s doing is truly amazing. It’s replicable, and can really be used as a model throughout the world. Seeing groups like that and the work of Jaime Carroll and Brian Center fromA Better LA, where their work is scalable, challenged me to continue to think of new and innovative ways for social change. Seeing groups that are coming up with solutions that can be used everywhere was really cool.